This is a question that comes up often and Ali Tamaseb, partner DCVC, spent 300 hours analyzing public data, talking to founders and combing through Crunchbase and PitchBook on exaclty this topic .
The questions he had included:
* How many competitors did they have when they started?
* What were their defensibility/moats?
* Did the founders have work experience in the same sector/industry?
Here is a sample of what he found:
1. These companies had, what he calls ‘Super Founders” – those had a exit of $50m or an ARR of $10m+
2. Directly Relevant Industry Experience Does Not Matter;
3. The market was already large at the time of founding. 65% wanted market share from competitors.
4. Timing is overrated
5. Save Time, Save Money, Or Make Things Easier. By far the top-performing category is productivity.
6. Over 50% Were Competing With Multiple Incumbents At the Time of Founding
7. The Product Matters! most startups had very high differentiation in their core product offering with competitors
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a50d3/a50d3874d7b6372db8640a95c39c865758af6177" alt=""
50 learnings are listed by Ali. A nice list for you to ponder over state of your startup and the possibility of getting the U status.
Where I learnt this #414
Land of the “Super Founders“— A Data-Driven Approach to Uncover the Secrets of Billion Dollar Startups